First of all, whatsoever the perspective of a person on the issue of divorce, it is important to follow what God said in the book of Malachi: a “Disgusted I separated, says Yahweh the God of Israel” According to the Bible, the plan of God in marriage is whole life integration. “So long as they are no more twain, the combined God is not separate of the people” (Matthew:).
God understands that because the marriage is between two sinful people, the divorce can happen.
In the Old Testament, laid down by God some laws to protect the rights of those who have gone through divorce, especially the women (Deuteronomy: -). Emphasized by Jesus that such law was given because of the hardness of the hearts of the people, and not because it is the original will of God (Matthew:). The controversy that the divorce and the aasawang again is allowed in the Bible is rooted in the Jesus said in the book of Matthew: thirty-two and. The words “except for adultery” is the only word in Scripture that seems to be allowed God the divorce and the aasawang again. Many are conversant with such “except paragraphs” refers to “adultery” at the time of agreement to marry.
In this culture, jews, the girls and boys are reputed as married even though they agreed just yet to marry.
The immorality only at the time of the “agreement to marry” is could be enough reason for divorce.
Yet, the Greek word translated “fornication” can mean any kind of sexual immorality. Possible saying Jesus allowed divorce if there occurred sexual immorality between married.
The relations sexual is the sum and important ingredients of marriage, “The two will become one” (Genesis: twenty-four Matthew: five Ephesians:).
Therefore, disobedience or opposition to such provisions in the by having of relations sex outside marriage may be a sufficient reason for divorce. In mind also of Jesus the issue of the aasawang again in this passage The phrase “and married the other” (Matthew:) shows that the divorce and the aasawang-again is allowed if the underlying it in the phrase “except. ” Napakakahalagang remind that only the innocent party is only allowed to married again. Although it is not stated in the text, the permission to remarry after divorce is due to the compassion of God who enjoy the sin, and not to the man to make sexual immorality. There may be chance that the guilty party is allowed to married once again - but this concept is not taught in the verses mentioned. Reputed so that one Corinthians: fifteen is another besides the only reason that seemed to give consent to the aasawang again, if the unbelieving husband (man) has departed the his believing wife (woman) reason in the faith of the woman Jesus Christ. Yet, it is not mentioned in such a context the aasawang again, instead it's just saying that a believer is not obligated to continue their marriage if you want without question but his wife who are not believers. It is also said by others that the abuse (spouse or child) is enough reason for divorce even if it is not written in the Bible. This may be the case, but still not ever a wise step to do something not directly said in the Word of God. Sometimes the fact that despite of what ever mean “adultery, ” it is not enough reason for divorce, and no need for divorce. Even committed adultery the one married, can still learn to forgive the enjoy of guilt by the grace of God and re-start the reconstruction of their life as married. Forgiven us We can follow the example of God to forgive the sin of adultery (Ephesians:). Yet, in many instances, do not repent the wife and continued still her sexual immorality. In this time, you may use the saying in Matthew Many are also wishing to be able to remarry after the divorce and not that they're looking at the possibility that may be the will of God in them will remain unmarried.
Sometimes God calls a man to remain unmarried in order to not divide his attention (Corinthians: -).
The aasawang again after the divorce is the beast, in some instances, but that does not mean that it is the only option.