The content of the gripes of the standard legal"this as well as the discussion on the characteristics of the landform in the South China SeaBrought of the case on January, a few months after full control of China in the Scarborough shoal. Started the dispute in the territory without release of Japan's ownership of its Islands Spratly and no assigned country replace it that ownership of the archipelago without ratipikahan its the Treaty of San Francisco. But under a treaty in between Japan and the Republic of China (Taiwan), moved to Japan in the ownership of the Archipelago, Spratly to China. Aim of the Philippines to have a ruling stating that the claims in the South China Sea will have to comply with UNCLOS so that brushed aside, the nine dash lines which is the basis of the claim of China to treat the land covered by China here rocky, the land-cut-when-hibas, or submerged banks, and not the island and acknowledge the rights of the Philippines makagana within the exclusive term, economical and meet continental as stated in the UNCLOS without being harassed by China. First discussed by the court, if it shall have jurisdiction in such cases filed by the Philippines. First heard the petition of the Philippines on July, on the initiative of the prosecutor General Florin Hilbay and followed by the Secretary of Foreign Affairs Albert Del Rosario. Ignored and thrust them through China the grace period set by the Court so that it shall respond to an action brought the case of the Philippines. But released on December, exactly one week before the given date to December fifteen of the position paper the Ministry Policy of China concerning the jurisdiction of the arbitration on the South China Sea that brought by the Philippines. According to the position paper, there is no hurisdiksiyong the Court because cover its the determining of the sovereignty of the territory. On December, filed in Court of statements the Vietnam identifies its jurisdiction in the case, an explicit outs in the position released of China. Also asked Vietnam to 'consider' the legal rights and interests in its North, and the Paracels and the exclusive term, economical and meet a continental its at the discretion of the merits of the case of the Philippines. Explicitly also own"the nine-dash drawings of China, as the basis of the claims of the South China Sea, and said 'it has no legal basis'. The filing of the statement on Vietnam has not involvement in such a case, but just wanted to know their opinion because it is possible to affect the claims its may be the decision of the Court, a step to prevent direct kumprontahin China.
As expected, disputed by China was the revelation of Vietnam and called the claims of Vietnam 'illegal and without basis', and repeated that '(h)indi ever tatanggpin of China such claims.
More time, encouraged the spokesman of the Ministry Policy of China Hong Lei, 'identify of Vietnam's sovereignty and its right to the maritime and resolve with China the dispute related to Nansha based on the respect of facts historical and global law to jointly maintain peace and stability in the South China Sea. Yield in turn by Charles Jose, spokesman of the Department of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines, '(t)inuturing we that excess that will help the become statements of Vietnam. Just confirming its jurisdiction the tribunal and stable the case of the Philippines' Not opened to the public the hearings of the court but allowed its observe, the representatives of the governments of Australia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand and Japan. Rejected in turn by the Court at the request of the United States to observe, in the case, in this respect it is not party to the Convention. After determine of this Court shall have jurisdiction to certain concerns raised by the Philippines, set by the Court the hearing of the merits of the case from November twenty-four to November.
